September Ministry Theme, Transformation

Two perspectives by:


Humanist Icon

A Humanist Perspective: Transformation

By Jerry Lusa, Sunday Services Committee

The dictionary definitions for “transformation” include false hair, metamorphosis, modification of bacterial DNA, mathematical opera­tions and grammatical operations.  Who knew? Let’s stick with the more common definition: a thor­ough or dramatic change in form or appearance.

At first glance, Humanism does not have much to say about Transformation.  The most recent revision of the Humanist Manifesto talks about how “values and ideals…are subject to change as our knowledge and understandings advance.” That’s it. There are no miraculous transformations in Humanism.  Hu­manism doesn’t ask us to transform, and it doesn’t offer us transformation into something else.  It takes us as we are. Well, most forms of Humanism any­way. There is the loosely related Transhumanist movement.

From Wikipedia:

“Transhumanism is an international cultural and intellectual movement with an eventual goal of fundamentally transforming the hu­man condition by developing and making widely available technologies to greatly en­hance human intellectual, physical, and psy­chological capacities.”

“Transhumanism shares many elements of humanism, including a respect for reason and science, a commitment to progress, and a valuing of human (or transhuman) exis­tence in this life. Transhumanism differs from humanism in recognizing and anticipat­ing the radical alterations in the nature and possibilities of our lives resulting from vari­ous sciences and technologies.”

UU’s here at UUS:E should already know some­thing about Transhumanism, because one of the movement’s leaders is among us: James J. Hughes Ph.D, who has spoken and lectured at UUS:E about his field.

My first reaction to Transhumanism was the same I got from watching the movie Frankenstein for the first time, but with modern technology.  Car­bon nanotubes running through our brains, making us smarter and interfacing us with computers? Tita­nium exoskeletons giving us great strength? Not for me!  I don’t want to end up a cyborg. I want to stay 100% all natural H. sapiens!

But do I really want to be an “organic” hu­man?  I would be unable to chew most foods were it not for the metal (older) and composite (newer) fill­ings that have kept my teeth from falling apart.  Had I not worn metal braces to reposition my teeth, I would not be able to cleanly bite off a piece of lico­rice (see previous problem with fillings).  Without the use of custom-shaped light refraction prostheses (alright, eyeglasses), I would not be able to read eas­ily, nor thread a needle, nor take out a sliver, nor… you get the idea. For a while I had two metal im­plants in my left hand to help reconnect a torn liga­ment after a skiing accident.  Without them I would be unable to grasp things with the thumb of my left hand, a condition romantically called Gamekeeper’s Thumb.  Metal implants? Yes, thank you!

We might want to think of ourselves as “all natural” but many of us, perhaps most of us, ingest manufactured chemicals to keep our blood pressure within bounds, or to make up for an underachieving thyroid gland, or to be able to digest certain critical proteins, or… stop by any pharmacy and see what it takes to keep human bodies and minds alive and well. Some of us rely on machines and devices for our mobility, others to simply stay alive.  Do we consider someone who wears a Pacemaker to be a cyborg? Of course not.

My point?  Some of us, maybe even most, are already transhuman.  And while we might recoil from the technologies that will be available in the future, when we are faced with the choice of suffer­ing a failing [insert body part here] or signing the consent form for the next new fix, most of us will reach for the pen.



A Buddhist Perspective: Transformation

By Nancy Thompson,
UUS:E Buddhist Group

Transformation is at the heart of the Buddha’s teach­ings. At the individual level, it’s about liberation from suffering by transforming our attitude of disasisfaction and complaint into one of ease and wisdom.  The Buddha’s teachings were “never intended for  those who are already perfect saints,” teacher Bikkhu Bodhi writes. ”It is addressed to fallible human be­ ings beset with all the shortcomings typical of unpolished human nature: conduct that is fickle and impulsive, minds that are tainted by greed, anger and self­ishness, views that are distorted, and habits that lead  to harm for oneself and others. The purpose of the  teaching is to transform such people — ourselves —  into ‘accomplished ones’: into those whose every  action is pure, whose minds are calm and composed,  whose wisdom has fathomed the deepest truths, and  whose conduct is always marked by a compassionate  concern for others and for the welfare of the world.”

That transformation clearly would change the com­munity and the world.

Transforming ourselves is a process of looking “It’s not what we eat but what we digest that makes us strong; not what we gain but what we save that closely at the views and attitudes that guide our ac­tions, questioning whether they are accurate for the current moment or remnants of past experience that color our views, and mindfully choosing how to act rather than reacting automatically.  Tibetan Buddhism teaches that emotions are energies that have both enlightened and deluded aspects. For example, while anger can be poisonous and destruc­tive, the flip side – the enlightened aspect — is wis­dom. Think about it: There’s often a reason behind anger – we feel threatened or scared or disregarded or like our needs aren’t being met. With mindful­ness, we can transform the anger at what is happen­ing to wisdom that sees whether there is an injustice and looks for a compassionate way to right the wrong. By working with ourselves mindfully, moment by moment, the transformation from suffering to libera­tion is possible.