Forwarded this email? Subscribe here for more
The Self-Righteousness Problem in Unitarian Universalism
As with other religions, many UUs are self-righteous
David Cycleback
Jan 31
READ IN APP
“It's not a secret that UU is a magnet for eccentric people and also a magnet for self-righteous people.”— A Unitarian Universalist congregant“I thought UUs were supposed to be different, but they can be as self-righteous as Mormons.”— a former Unitarian Universalist
Unitarian Universalism (UU) is a faith tradition that prides itself on inclusivity, open-mindedness, and a commitment to social justice. With its roots in classically liberal religious thought and pluralism, UUism presents itself as an alternative to dogmatic, exclusionary belief systems.
David Cycleback: Big Ideas is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.
However, despite its emphasis on tolerance and open-mindedness, Unitarian Universalism is not immune to the human tendency toward self-righteousness. In their dedication to justice and progress, some within the UU community develop a sense of moral superiority that can alienate those who do not fully align with their perspectives. This issue, while not unique to UUs, risks undermining the very values the faith seeks to uphold.
The Nature of UU Self-Righteousness
For some Unitarian Universalists, self-righteousness manifests as a rigid adherence to progressive ideals, an intolerance of differing viewpoints, and a tendency to view ideological opponents as morally deficient. Many UUs see themselves as having transcended the narrow-mindedness of more conservative religious traditions. While their commitment to social justice is commendable, it can sometimes result in an exclusionary mindset in which those who question certain doctrines are dismissed as ignorant, regressive, or even immoral.
This tendency is evident in political and social discussions within UU congregations and forums. Because most congregations lean strongly leftward, conservative perspectives—whether political, theological, or cultural—are often marginalized or even silenced. While UUism champions the principle of a “free and responsible search for truth and meaning,” in practice, this principle is often applied selectively. Those who express dissenting opinions on complex social issues may find themselves ostracized rather than engaged in open dialogue.
Psychological and Social Factors
Several psychological and social factors contribute to this dynamic. One key factor is confirmation bias, where people seek out and reinforce information that aligns with their existing beliefs while dismissing contrary perspectives. In UU communities, this can create an echo chamber effect, where members continuously reaffirm one another’s views without exposure to meaningful dissent.
Another contributing factor is moral absolutism disguised as relativism. While UUs often claim to embrace a plurality of beliefs, there is often an implicit assumption that progressive values are unquestionably correct. This can lead to virtue signaling, where people publicly express their commitment to justice and inclusivity—sometimes more to reinforce their moral standing than to foster genuine dialogue.
Additionally, tribalism and group identity play a role. Like all social groups, UU congregations foster a sense of belonging and shared identity. However, this can sometimes result in an “us versus them” mentality, where those outside the group—especially conservatives, traditionalists, or skeptics of certain social justice ideologies—are viewed with suspicion or disdain. This contradicts UUism’s commitment to radical inclusivity and respect for diverse beliefs.
In recent years, Unitarian Universalism has also become increasingly politically uniform, limiting the range of perspectives within its congregations. The influence of the Unitarian Universalist Association (UUA) and UU seminaries has further reinforced this narrowing, as many ministers are trained in a doctrinaire form of progressive activism. Ironically, some of the most rigid and dogmatic voices in UU spaces today are activist ministers who embody the very close-mindedness that UU is supposed to challenge.
The Consequences of Self-Righteousness
The self-righteousness problem in UUism has real consequences for both individual congregations and the broader movement.
Alienation of Potential Members – People who might otherwise be drawn to UUism—such as moderate liberals, independent thinkers, or spiritual seekers—may feel unwelcome in an environment that appears ideologically rigid. This dynamic can contribute to declining membership and a shrinking diversity of perspectives within UU congregations.
Intellectual Stagnation – When dissenting voices are discouraged or suppressed, intellectual and spiritual growth suffer. UUs pride themselves on being lifelong learners, but true learning requires engaging with challenging and uncomfortable ideas. If congregations become echo chambers, they risk losing the intellectual humility necessary for real wisdom.
Erosion of Compassion and Empathy – Self-righteousness can weaken the very compassion and empathy that UUism seeks to embody. When people become convinced of their own moral superiority, they may struggle to extend genuine understanding to those with different beliefs. This can lead to performative activism rather than meaningful engagement with complex ethical and social issues.
Separation from Wider Society and Communities – A culture of ideological purity can isolate UU congregations from the broader society, including communities they seek to support, such as marginalized and minority groups. Many religious, ethnic, and working-class communities hold diverse perspectives, including traditional values that may not fully align with UU progressivism. When UUism takes an approach that implicitly or explicitly dismisses these perspectives, it risks becoming disconnected from the very people it claims to stand in solidarity with. This insularity weakens UUism’s ability to build meaningful interfaith and intercultural relationships.
Overcoming the Self-Righteousness Problem
Addressing self-righteousness within Unitarian Universalism requires a conscious effort to cultivate true openness and humility.
Encouraging Ideological Diversity – Congregations should not only tolerate conservative or moderate viewpoints but actively seek to understand them. True inclusivity means engaging with differing perspectives, not just those that align with progressive ideology.
Cultivating Intellectual Humility – Recognizing that no one has a monopoly on truth is essential. UUs should model humility by engaging in respectful debate, asking questions rather than making assumptions, and remaining open to changing their minds when presented with compelling evidence.
Revitalizing the Free and Responsible Search for Truth – This foundational UU principle must be applied consistently across all areas of life, not just those that align with progressive activism. Congregations should create spaces where difficult conversations can happen without fear of judgment or exclusion.